Sony PlayStation Breach - Timeline and Q&A with Paul Henry
Thursday, 26 May 2011 - 15:43 EDT
Source: http://lastwatchdog.com
Sony PlayStation Network Data Breach
Timeline
By Byron Acohido
Posted on | May 26,
2011
Sony's troubles with hackers continues. Reuters has just
reported that Sony Ericsson's Canadian eShop website was shut down
by hackers, with personal data stolen from 2,000 more
customers.
Earlier this week Sony disclosed that 8,500 Greek user
accounts had been compromised and its sites hit in Thailand and
Indonesia. That, of course, follows last month's granddaddy denial
of service attack and theft of personal data for more than 100
million customers of Sony's PlayStation Network.
Sony CEO Howard Stringer has apologized in a letter to customers
and said the company is "working with the FBI and other law
enforcement agencies around the world to apprehend those
responsible."
As a rule of thumb, corporations strive to publicly disclose as
few details as they can, for as long as they can, about any data
breaches they've suffered.
Yet the hack of Sony's PlayStation Network has interestingly
emerged as one of the most widely discussed data breaches in recent
memory. Here is an illuminating timeline compiled by
vulnerability management firm Lumension that may help you
understand why.
Sony PlayStation breach timeline
Apr. 20 - PlayStation experiences beginning of network
outage
Apr. 26 (9:30 a.m. PT) - PlayStation Network outage for 6 days
and still no answers available for its customers
Apr. 26 (1:00 p.m. PT) - Later that same day, Sony says billing
addresses, user names, passwords and possibly credit card info
belonging to its PlayStation Network Customers have been stolen
Apr. 27 - News about how unhappy users are with the lack of
information from Sony continues to run rampant and Sony is
sued.
Apr. 28 - A database of 2.2 million Sony customer credit cards
is offered for sale on an underground Internet forum
Apr. 29 - Government officials question what Sony is doing and
how they will make things right with customers
Apr. 30 - Sony PlayStation Network services announced they will
be up and running later in the week and customers will get a free
30-day service and theft protection monitoring service
May 2 - The PlayStation breach extends to Sony Online
Entertainment
May 4 - Reports surface about Anonymous' potential involvement
in the hack, but they deny it
May 5 - NY attorney general subpoenas Sony and the same day the
CEO offers the first apology and explanation for what may have
happened
May 6 - According to reports, a security expert testifies to a
House subcommittee that Sony knew it was in possession of outdated
security software
May 7 - Sony says the PlayStation network might not be up and
running as quickly as they thought due to more testing needed
May 12 - Sony announces "perks" post-breach
May 14 - Sony begins relaunch of PlayStation Network in
stages
May 16 - Japan's government announces they are waiting for
better security measures from Sony
May 25 - Sony discloses compromise of 8,500 Greek user
accounts and its sites hit in Thailand and Indonesia.
May 27 - Sony discloses shut down and data loss from Sony
Ericsson's Canada website; data for 2,000 people, including names,
email addresses and encrypted password, appear on The Hacker News
web site.
Q & A with Paul Henry, Lumension, Security and
Forensic Analyst
LW: What is a plausible scenario for how the
Sony breach occurred?
Henry: It was initially a DDoS attack by
Anonymous that failed as Sony contracted with Prolexic for DDoS
defense. From the ICQ messages I have seen Anonymous knew the DDoS
attacks were failing by simply looking at a trace-route for Sony
traffic as the attack waned... they were able to determine Prolexic
had been engaged and had previously successfully defended multiple
other Anonymous targets.
One of the last ICQ messages I read noted that Anonymous
recognized the failure of the DDoS attacks and all on the ICQ chat
knew they had to change tactics. It seems logical that the new
tactic was a direct assault against Sony's servers - something that
Anonymous recently denied they were involved in, but later a rumor
was circulating that a "fringe" group from Anonymous had actually
done the subsequent penetration of the Sony network.
We have no hard data from Sony, but rumor has it the servers
that were breached were running an old un-patched version of Apache
on top of an old un-patched version of RedHat and were facing the
public Internet without a firewall. This seems like it could very
well have been the case because if they had a firewall and other
traditional defenses in place there would have been logs that could
have allowed Sony to answer the question as to whether credit card
number had actually been removed from the network or not -
something that they could not definitively answer.
LW: Why have data thieves
begun to go after targets like Sony and Epsilon?
Henry: Sony was more of a hactivist action
whereby allegedly Anonymous went after them originally because
(revenge) of the legal action Sony took against the PlayStation
Hacker - George Holtz. Once Anonymous or for that matter whoever it
was that entered the Sony network realized that Sony had no
formable defenses on their network it seems the gloves came off and
they simply took revenge by plundering their environment at
will.
As for Epsilon there was no hactivist motivation noted on the
typical ICQ servers after the attack so I think it is safe to
assume they were a target simply because of their lack of
meaningful defenses.
LW: Do you expect this trend
to accelerate?
Henry: Hactivism by individuals will accelerate
and the next logical evolution will be State Sponsored Hactivism.
We have already seen the rise of State Sponsored hacking related to
intelligence gathering i.e Google Hack, etc hence States already
know hacking is an effective tool to be used today and one can only
expect States to support hactivist's to drive their messages to
their adversaries.
LW: What are the short term
and longer term implications for companies and consumers?
Henry: Short term - it means that it is not
only the intellectual property or PII you store that makes you a
target - today anyone is a target if for no other reason then your
political view. The bottom line is that the first to fall will be
those environments that failed to exercise reasonable risk
management and chose either minimal security or at best the use of
yesterday's obsolete signature based defenses i.e traditional AV,
IDS & IPS.
Long term - the writing is on the wall; we are entering an
age where as a public company how well your information is
protected is clearly going to be reflected in the value of your
publicly traded shares.
By Byron Acohido
SOURCE:
http://lastwatchdog.com/sony-playstation-network-data-breach-timeline/